We must inform men and women around the world that these government service corporation statutes, mandates, bylaws, do not apply to man or woman, unless under written contract!!
Spot on. Legislation is contractual and only applies to civil servants. Living men and women are simply tricked into tacit consent. Remove yourself from the electoral roll by saying “I am no longer a member of the public and wish to leave your corrupted system” You can also mention you want no part in their war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocides.
We must never agree to being a CPR, citizen, person or resident! Also, ever notice the fraud called taxes is sent to your all-Caps name, in boxes (four corner rule). And on top in capital letters says, TAX NOTICE! Not invoice, but a notice! Yes, I do NOTICE your fraud! Teehee I could go on forever!
NZ, Australia, Canada, and the US all have very similar systems so yes it will work but you will need to do some work changing the references to suit your legislation. Just don’t expect an apology from these clowns the best you can hope for is they go away and leave you alone. Good luck.
The people are sovereign not the king and definitely not the parliament. If only the people woke up and stood up for their rights we win. Con-vid may have done the trick. Panic is setting in amongst the parasite class so fingers crossed.
I disagree with Sovereignty, Sovereignty is Kings and Queens that aquire there riches, land and Servants and army via manipulation, force and control, Tax's and slavery.
Suveran is different in the fact that you are your own King, your own authority, ruler and have acquired your own land and dominion without the use of FORCE or CONTROL.
I just ceased to consent to the whole psychopathic legal/governmental system and stand on Ethical ground. I will be happy to be subject to anything in that system if They prove I am in Their jurisdiction. (Wouldn't want to create controversy...)
Until it is proven, I expect and demand that all communications to Me must be in clear and certain terms, completely covering things involved, and in the vernacular. For any actions that might affect Me, Ethically, My consent must be received after such communications are given to Me.
Watch this space, the 14 days are not over yet. It has already worked many times all over the country. Baron David Ward started the ball rolling, see https://truthaddict.substack.com/p/how-to-destroy-the-matrix. I just added another 2 points for good measure. It does work with all fines including ULEZ because fines before conviction in court are highly illegal. Do not expect an apology though. It will just go quiet.
If it gets to the bailiff stage you simply use a DSAR to ask the question "Please supply a legally executed Deed of Assignment" and they are stumped. When they fail to produce it you then have a £5000 claim in the small claims court.
Our systems are very similar so yes. You also have the clearfield doctrine you can use;
All courts where dissolved in 2008 under the clearfield doctrine then became registered companies on Dunn and Bradstreet company search. When governments enter the world of commerce, they are subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation U.S v Burr 309 U.S 22. See 22, U.S CA 286 e Bank of US v Planters Bank of Georgia 6L Ed (Wheat 244.) NOTE: Under the Clearfield Doctrine, the courts are no longer government entities in that they are demanding private monies and must have a contract with you to compel performance. They are no more special as a normal business than your local Jack In The Box. Clearfield Doctrine - “private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation” . Government create and enforce CIVIL LAWS known as statues, acts and legislation created by the Bar Association (set up by Rothschilds) which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency!
Governments Have Descended to the Level of Mere Private Corporations
Clearfield Doctrine Supreme Court Annotated Statute, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363- 371 1942 Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute: Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 1942: "Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen . . . where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is concerned . . . For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government." What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation. As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government, like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific performance are made. And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called statutes. This case is very important because it is a 1942 case that was decided after the UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY filed its "CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION" in the State of Florida (July 15, 1925). And it was decided AFTER the 'corporate government' agreed to use the currency of the private corporation, the FEDERAL RESERVE. The private currency, the Federal Reserve Note, is still in use today. References: (i) Articles of Incorporation of UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-ofincorporation-of-u-scorp-company.pdf (ii) From The Great American Adventure by Judge Dale, retired. (pages 93-94) http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/the-greatamerican-adventurecomplete-work-by-judge-dale.pdf [4] Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they are a fiction and only exist on paper. 5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You bet they do! 6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their corporate regulations? [8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334- 2000] (iii) Our Government is Just Another Corporation http://anticorruptionsociety.com/is-our-government-just-anothercorporation
Data Subject Access Request. Really annoying and expensive for companies to process you are entitled to every piece of paper, email, photo, or with your name face or property on it within 28 days by law.
This helps build a case to make a claim for thousands of pounds from bailiffs, councils, companies or governments.
Very powerful tool. Just ask a bailiff to produce a legally executed deed of assignment using a DSAR and you have a claim for at least £5000 in 28 days!
We must inform men and women around the world that these government service corporation statutes, mandates, bylaws, do not apply to man or woman, unless under written contract!!
Spot on. Legislation is contractual and only applies to civil servants. Living men and women are simply tricked into tacit consent. Remove yourself from the electoral roll by saying “I am no longer a member of the public and wish to leave your corrupted system” You can also mention you want no part in their war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocides.
We must never agree to being a CPR, citizen, person or resident! Also, ever notice the fraud called taxes is sent to your all-Caps name, in boxes (four corner rule). And on top in capital letters says, TAX NOTICE! Not invoice, but a notice! Yes, I do NOTICE your fraud! Teehee I could go on forever!
You're still tax cattle. Te he.
Yes LAW and Legality are two different things based off a Man /Woman or a Persona.
You cannot serve two Masters GOD or the Government.
Transition from Private to Public and learn the skill of holding your position.
Well done on the notices !!
Part 2 coming soon, I will be calling it Dorset Council admit fraud and admit they have no authority!
I have stuffed them with the legal maxim "He, who does not deny, admits".
I have also hit the adjudicator with a 12 question FOI request just for good measure!
Do you know if I can apply this protocol in NZ ? because I am tempted to try it- the electoral roll one is really tempting ! = )
NZ, Australia, Canada, and the US all have very similar systems so yes it will work but you will need to do some work changing the references to suit your legislation. Just don’t expect an apology from these clowns the best you can hope for is they go away and leave you alone. Good luck.
What a shit storm the UK has become.
God save the commoners!
The people are sovereign not the king and definitely not the parliament. If only the people woke up and stood up for their rights we win. Con-vid may have done the trick. Panic is setting in amongst the parasite class so fingers crossed.
I disagree with Sovereignty, Sovereignty is Kings and Queens that aquire there riches, land and Servants and army via manipulation, force and control, Tax's and slavery.
Suveran is different in the fact that you are your own King, your own authority, ruler and have acquired your own land and dominion without the use of FORCE or CONTROL.
I totally agree on that one. So much so I have just named my house Suveran Castle!
We should take back the authority and responsibility for ourselves and not try to rule anyone else.
Nicely done
Spot on.
Citizen Uprising: Lock Down all Politicians
Citizen House Arrest all Politicians on presumption of Treason and Corruption
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/citizen-uprising-lock-down-all-politicians
Good luck trying to waken the ignorant and tired masses. We are enslaved! It takes force to bring about any change!
The government enforces their law (just ink on paper), by using force dished out by their lackeys aka police/soldiers/lawyers!
PEOPLE BARELY MAKE ENOUGH TO BUY FOOD AND HAVE SHELTER.
Yet, the government keeps taxing us on every level.
Do not despair, freedom is just a state of mind.
Maybe we cannot save everyone but I would not be able to sleep if I didn’t try.
Alternative systems are already being built all around the world.
We have many new courts, some with Sheriffs, some are even building jails.
https://commonlawcourt.com/
https://www.ca-britishisles.com/
https://clciaustralia.com/blog/
https://thepeoplescourtofterraaustralis.org/
All the best to you in the UK.
The answer to your titled article question is YES!
Justice seems to be endangered throughout the western countries.
Thugs in charge all around in lockstep with the UN. They'll do as much evil as allowed. There will be a reckoning.
We just need to find an honest lawyer, there was one in Germany but they locked him up very quickly.
If only everyone knew their rights they wouldn’t get away with it.
Alternatives to the current system are springing up all over the place, I think it’s best just to jump ship at this stage…
I just ceased to consent to the whole psychopathic legal/governmental system and stand on Ethical ground. I will be happy to be subject to anything in that system if They prove I am in Their jurisdiction. (Wouldn't want to create controversy...)
Until it is proven, I expect and demand that all communications to Me must be in clear and certain terms, completely covering things involved, and in the vernacular. For any actions that might affect Me, Ethically, My consent must be received after such communications are given to Me.
The GentleOne’s Solution (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/the-gentleones-solution
Just Stop Consenting! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/just-stop-consenting
AND
Join Me as a Sovereign Here on Ethical Ground (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/join-me-as-a-sovereign-here-on-ethical
Brilliant, did it actually work? And do you think it would work with ULEZ “fines”?
Watch this space, the 14 days are not over yet. It has already worked many times all over the country. Baron David Ward started the ball rolling, see https://truthaddict.substack.com/p/how-to-destroy-the-matrix. I just added another 2 points for good measure. It does work with all fines including ULEZ because fines before conviction in court are highly illegal. Do not expect an apology though. It will just go quiet.
If it gets to the bailiff stage you simply use a DSAR to ask the question "Please supply a legally executed Deed of Assignment" and they are stumped. When they fail to produce it you then have a £5000 claim in the small claims court.
I wonder if there is something similar that could be tried in the USA?
Our systems are very similar so yes. You also have the clearfield doctrine you can use;
All courts where dissolved in 2008 under the clearfield doctrine then became registered companies on Dunn and Bradstreet company search. When governments enter the world of commerce, they are subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation U.S v Burr 309 U.S 22. See 22, U.S CA 286 e Bank of US v Planters Bank of Georgia 6L Ed (Wheat 244.) NOTE: Under the Clearfield Doctrine, the courts are no longer government entities in that they are demanding private monies and must have a contract with you to compel performance. They are no more special as a normal business than your local Jack In The Box. Clearfield Doctrine - “private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation” . Government create and enforce CIVIL LAWS known as statues, acts and legislation created by the Bar Association (set up by Rothschilds) which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency!
Governments Have Descended to the Level of Mere Private Corporations
Clearfield Doctrine Supreme Court Annotated Statute, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363- 371 1942 Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute: Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 1942: "Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen . . . where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is concerned . . . For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government." What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation. As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government, like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific performance are made. And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called statutes. This case is very important because it is a 1942 case that was decided after the UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY filed its "CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION" in the State of Florida (July 15, 1925). And it was decided AFTER the 'corporate government' agreed to use the currency of the private corporation, the FEDERAL RESERVE. The private currency, the Federal Reserve Note, is still in use today. References: (i) Articles of Incorporation of UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-ofincorporation-of-u-scorp-company.pdf (ii) From The Great American Adventure by Judge Dale, retired. (pages 93-94) http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/the-greatamerican-adventurecomplete-work-by-judge-dale.pdf [4] Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they are a fiction and only exist on paper. 5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You bet they do! 6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their corporate regulations? [8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334- 2000] (iii) Our Government is Just Another Corporation http://anticorruptionsociety.com/is-our-government-just-anothercorporation
DSAR?
Data Subject Access Request. Really annoying and expensive for companies to process you are entitled to every piece of paper, email, photo, or with your name face or property on it within 28 days by law.
This helps build a case to make a claim for thousands of pounds from bailiffs, councils, companies or governments.
Very powerful tool. Just ask a bailiff to produce a legally executed deed of assignment using a DSAR and you have a claim for at least £5000 in 28 days!